Effects of Media Violence on Children - 2430 Words

The Effect of Media Violence on Children and Levels of Aggression. It has been said that children are like sponges when it comes to attaining knowledge. This seems to be true whether they are learning to speak or how to show emotion. Feelings and emotions become more imminent once children begin to go through adolescents. Children acquire the ability to aggression, sadness, and happiness more readily. Males typically exhibit higher levels of aggression then females according to some research. Within the realm of learning children imitate what they see constantly, whether it be through TV, magazines ,movies, or radio. Media plays a strong role on how children act to different situations that they may have seen. Sometimes the†¦show more content†¦In another experiment conducted by Liebart and Baron (1972) there was a strong correlation with violent behavior after viewing violent material. A group of kids ages from 5 to 9 was chosen and were subjected to the experiment one at a time. They were first warmed by watch watching 2 minutes of TV that was neutral to violent and non- violent. After the two minutes were up the children were randomly assigned to a non- violent group that went to watch an exciting sports sequence for three and half minutes. The other group was subjected to was three and half minutes of the movie Untouchables , which was rated R. After the child was given the opportunity help another child or hurt them. They had could help the other child with the game they were playing or hurt by making the handle that the child was holding hot. After the experiment was over the results proved their hypothesis correctly. Children that watched the violent film were more likely to make the handle hot for another child then was the other non- violent movie group. Also later when the children were observed at play the subjects that had watched the violent film played more with the violent toys( fake guns and knives) then the other group. A study by Bjorkqvist (1985) showed that even cartoon character violence h as an affect on children. In the experiment who used 87 kids. 45 from preschoolShow MoreRelatedThe Effects Of Media Violence On Children873 Words   |  4 Pages According to the Media Education Foundation, once a child reaches eighteen years of age, they have witnessed around 200,000 acts of violence and 16,000 murders (jacksonkatz.com). Our society loves entertainment and a grand portion of this entertainment contains violence. Children constantly consume violent visuals, due to their prevalence. Majority of our society is uninterested in the effects of media violence since its effects do not show immediately. Misinformation is our greatest enemy in theRead MoreThe Effects Of Media Violence On Children974 Words   |  4 Pagesmany kinds of media, like Internet, video game, television and film. It is generally believed that some of the bad information such as violent content in the media can have a negative effect on people, and it can end up causing some social problem. It is c lear that children are more likely to be influenced by media violence than other age groups because of their world outlook and personality are not formed. Furthermore is if media violence does have some profound influence on children, this will leadRead MoreThe Effects Of Media Violence On Children884 Words   |  4 Pagesis all this necessary to fabricate in the media? What are characters in movies teaching kids? What about the language in music talking about killing people and talking about violence like it’s the cool thing? What about new channels always talking about guns, bombs and threats to the public, is this what is influencing are children because they view it as a norm? Some may agree with this as others may disagree. Media violence is not the factor in violence today. Studies show that over 90% of homesRead MoreThe Effects Of Media Violence On Children1357 Words   |  6 Pagesthe graphic cruelty and violence. According to American Psychological Association, the harmful influence of media violence on children dates back to the 1950s and 1960s, and remains strong today. A child that watches violence or hears about violence can be influenced to become violent. Indeed, in reviewing the totality of empirical evidence regarding the impact of media violence, the conclusion that exposure to violent portrayals poses a risk of harmful effects on children has been reached by theRead MoreThe Effects Of Media Violence On Children1943 Words   |  8 PagesFor many years now, the media has been a big part of our lives. Almost everybody in the world is or has connected to it one way or another. It is a way for families and friends to have fun together, for interesting topics that people are interested in, or to just enjoy alone. However, there is a problem that can be seen across all types of media: violence. Violence can be seen as a distraught way to get over problems. There is judgement issues involved for violence. It is done by bullies in schoolRead MoreThe Effects Of Media Violence On Children2411 Words   |  10 PagesMedia Violence is definitely harmful to children as the exposure of media violence can desensitize children (age 6-12) to violence and in the real world; violence becomes enjoyable and does not result in apprehensiveness in the child. There have been several studies and experiments regarding the adverse effects of violence used in video games, television, as well as movies. With both preschool and school-aged children, studies have found that they are more likely to imitate the violence they seeRead MoreThe Effects Of Media Violence On Children2122 Words   |  9 Pagesexposed to various types of media, for example books or magazines, television, song lyrics, video games, and movies. Media often portrays, aggressive action, behaviour, and violence. This content can negatively affect not only adolescents and adults, but can have an even greater effect on children even from the moment they are exposed to it. Children who are exposed to violence in the media may display aggressive and violent behaviour. Young people especially children under the age of eight thisRead MoreThe Effects Of Media Violence On Children1903 Words   |  8 Pagesdepict different forms of violence. Some people feel that there is too much violence exposed in the media. Many studies have made the claim that the media is responsible for much of the violence seen in the world we live in. However, people have choices and responsibilities we cannot allow ourselves to blame it on other things such as the media. The violence seen in our media has an impact on both adults and children. Since children are also exposed to various forms of media, there has been additionalRead MoreThe Effects Of Media Violence On Children1270 Words   |  6 Pagesdifferent forms of violence. Some people feel that there is too much violence exposed in the media. Many studies have made the claim that the media is responsible for much of the violence seen in the world we live in (List and Wolfgang). However, people have choices and responsibilities we cannot allow ourselves to blame it on other things such as the media. The violence seen in our media has an impact on both adults and children. Since children are also exposed to various forms of media, there has beenRead MoreWhat Is the Effect of Media Violence on Children1314 Words   |  6 PagesYasser Abdelaziz Ms. Williams English 1010-18 13, December 2010 The Effect of Media Violence on Children Although very little research was done on it in the past, media violence has sparked much controversy in recent history. As technology becomes more advanced, new methods of uncovering the media’s effects on children have emerged. Advances in Neuroscience, for example, can become tools to understanding the effects media violence has from a psychological standpoint. The brain in its underpinnings

Analysis Of The Devil - 1376 Words

The Devil Is in the Details Writing an essay is like constructing a building. They are similar from their overall strong and beautiful structures to their small units like bricks to the building and words to the essay. Grammar glues all the words together in nice order to make sentences, which are put in the structure to make a good essay. Like many other students who are not native speakers, I do not have a strong English foundation, but I am still able to make a great structure for my essays. However, much like people do not feel comfortable living in houses that look good on the outside but have holes in the walls, ugly light fixtures, and other terrible details on the inside, people do not like to read essays that have strong†¦show more content†¦That means basically almost every word I speak or write involves tenses. For Americans, tense to their language is like breathing to our body. Something that is crucially important but we do not really pay attention to it since we are doing it way too ofte n. By contrast, as a Chinese, whose language has nothing to do with tenses, I have to say I have struggled with tenses a lot. What has made me struggle the most in this essay is the special uses of the present tense. Rules for Writers explains that we should â€Å"Use the present tense when expressing general truths, when writing about literature, and when quoting, summarizing, or paraphrasing an author s views.† (245). It sounds pretty easy, but I did get confused when I was writing the essay. In the essay, I spoke in general about the relationship between a father and a son. Since I wanted to write about the boy in his different ages, I felt so weird to use the present tense. At that point, it just did not make sense to me if I used the present tense to describe both his childhood and adulthood. So, here is a sentence I wrote, â€Å"But soon the boy went into his adolescence, and slowly realized that there are many things his dad did not know, and actually he was kind of o utdated.† Now let us take a closer look to what Rules for Writers says about tenses. Tenses is only involved in the relation between when I am writing an event and when that event take place, which means it does not

Does Language Equal Power and Does It Define You as a Writer free essay sample

With language, we can communicate who we are and what we think. Without language, we would be isolated. We would have no discipline, no past, no present and no future. To understand how meaning works, then, is to understand part of what it is to be human . Ultimately language is a necessary means of life, which some say that language derived from grunts and groans and evolved into the complex form that we know today. As a writer you choose the direction you will follow when communicating to your reader . To a degree you hold the â€Å"power† of defining yourself. Should you allow others to dictate you’re identity We have three writers Kincaid, Fanon and Anzaldua, all with similar viewpoints, however all electing to communicate their story differently through language. All expressing their beliefs differently (between there tone, and careful choice of words), all speaking about events they have either witness and or experienced throughout their lives. All seem to be obsessed with their topic choice. Question that I have is if these writers are similar, expressive and passionate about what they do, then what makes one writer work seem more appealing, more impactful, and more powerful to a reader then the other? Is it the dialects the writers utilize that has the reader prone to one writer over the other? Is it the way the writer’s language translates to paper, and does that solely play a role in distinguishing them as a writer? Perhaps it is where they receive their education, which allows them to get their point across in a comprehensible way and keep the attention of the reader? By the way that Fanon, Kincaid and Anzaldua choices to convey language fuels them with the power, whether it is power that they receive from the reader, the power that is self-inflicted, or the power that is forced upon them. They all receive, utilize and gain from their power as writers. Just as knowledge is power so is language. We have Fanon, a Negro, a Doctor, a Man, an Object (he, himself, not really aware of what title he will represent on what day) seeming to be imprisoned in his Black Man’s body but living in a White Man’s World ( Fanon wants to be looked at as man, a person, not by the color of his skin). Although Fanon himself is trapped he continues to criticize every writer that he references within his book (why reference them if you’re going to solely criticize them). How is it that you could feel trapped in your own human skin, however chapter by chapter criticize those that have made a stance for what they believe. We have Kincaid, a Negro, a Women, and a Native; (she never really referencing herself by a title, nor does she disclose detailed information about herself in this book, at one point the language she uses makes it difficult to determine even her sex) Kincaid uses language to express her bitterness, fury, and resentment at colonists and the Antiguans for failing to fully achieve their independence. Lastly we have Anzaldua, a Teacher, a Chicano, and a Woman (a person that has learned to embrace all three titles) who wants her readers to be able to comprehend the problem that she has faced with her own language. If we look at Fanon, Kincaid and Anzaldua they all have one thing in common, they all have referenced language in their own way. They also have one thing in which they go in different directions with, which is the verbatim that they use to convey the message to the reader. Kincaid begins her book â€Å"A Small Place† utilizing a peaceful direction of language; however she quickly rises to a bitter, angry writer. I believe revisiting Antigua was the beginning to her fueled bitterness. â€Å"T H E A N T I G U A that I knew, the Antigua in which I grew up, is not the Antigua you, a tourist would see now. That Antigua no longer exists. †[23] Kincaid remembers the area around her where she grew up, no longer exist due to â€Å"the bad minded English†[41] when she reflect back, her anger infuriates her. Kincaid’s introduction begins with â€Å"If You Go To Antigua as a tourist, this is what you will see. Kincaid’s introduction to A Small Place has me question, at first, the direction that she is taking the book in. Is she questioning whether you will travel to Antigua because it’s a small place, or is her reason for leading with this phase her way of warning the reader? It has me believe that by continuing to read this book you will no longer want to travel to Antigua, or that Antigua has become such an ugly place that the writer wouldn’t want you to travel to Antigua. My assumption for this stems from the word â€Å"IF†. Although she leads with a phase that you nstantly question, you understand it, you may question the â€Å"IF† but you understand what she is saying. The vocabulary and language that she uses throughout the book is one that reflects simplicity, uncomplicatedness, and straightforwardness. In Kincaids book I found myself only wondering how was I to tie this book into previous books that we read in the past. Unfortunately I am unable to state that for all. Black Skin White Mask begins with a little history of Franz Fanon; he was born 1925, in the French Colony of Martinique. Fanon left Martinique in 1945, when he served in the French Free Army in World War II, Fanon decided to stay in France where he would study medicine and psychiatry in Lyon; this is where Fanon would shape his psychological theories about race and culture. Fanons first chapter focused on the â€Å"colonist subjugation† of a Negro. Fanon seems to comply with the dominant language philosophy of his day when he boldly declares that â€Å"a man who has a language consequently possesses the world expressed and implied by that language’’ [14]. Of course, this is just a theory, as many other factors come into play. If the theory held true independently, then consequently, the Negro would not be placed in the debilitate position of possessing an inferiority complex because he would possess the world of the white colonizer and share co-equal status. Throughout ever chapter Fanon has figured out a way to have the readers become lost in his words. It seems that transitioning from one chapter to another becomes more difficult when moving throughout the chapters. Fanon speaks about his observation that the isomorphic relationship between the races results in a massive â€Å"psycho-existential† [xvi] complex. A â€Å"cure† can only be had of one analyzes racism as a symptom. Fanon continues to argue that only a â€Å"psychoanalytic interpretation† can revolutionize the significance of the symptoms so as to make live more livable. â€Å"Why write this book? † â€Å"No one has asked me for it. † â€Å"Especially those to whom it is directed. † â€Å"Well? † â€Å"I reply quite calmly that there are too many idiots in this world. And having said it, I have the burden of proving it. † And with that perhaps this books unintentionally, becomes the mixture of conditional study, physiological analysis. olitical manifesto, an exploration of sexual identity and identifies and hovering at the center of Fanon’s own examination of himself . Fanon as I see him is a founding father of modern post-colonial criticism, who represents himself as French, however doesn’t want to be label or questioned (because French is considered the more cultura l language). â€Å"I was hated, detested, and despised, not by my next-door neighbor or a close cousin, but by the entire race. I was against something irrational. †[98], although Fanon come across that going against his own race would be ridiculous, he feels it necessary to defend himself. Fanon later states that â€Å"In no way do I have to dedicate myself to retrieving a black civilization unjustly ignored. I will not make myself the man of the past†. [201]. If Fanon feels as though he isn’t a man of the past, but is the man of the future then why does he feel it necessary to defend himself? Fanon must understand that in order to fix the future you must first understand and come to grips with your past. Fanon seems to be a lost searching for answers through the languages that he speaks; this is due to the French language and living under the French rule. Fanon feels as though if he speaks in such language then he will be more accepted amongst the â€Å"white â€Å"people, amongst French. They will no longer see a â€Å"nigga† walking the street they will see a doctor, they will no longer see a â€Å"negro† they will see a man equal in race. I believe that language can either block communications (which Fanon has managed to complete for some, based on the medical terms and language that he uses) or it can release the barrios that we have for communication. Language sets you identity. Gloria Anzaldua has taken language and her identity in a different route in â€Å"How to Tame a Wild Tongue. † Gloria begins with her in a dentist office; the dentist is complaining that her tongue is strong and stubborn. She thinks to herself, â€Å"How do you tame a wild tongue, train it to be quiet†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (75). Despite the fact that the dentist wasn’t referring to her accent, her reaction makes it obvious that the problems she has had with the way she speaks causes her to be constantly conscious of how other people view her. She believes her accent is something that defines her. Ultimately Gloria realizes that until she takes pride in her language, she cannot take pride in herself. She speaks about the problem she faced with her own language and how she represents herself through language. Gloria speaks about how Chicanas have a complexity expressing themselves and feelings. She feels that the reason for this, is they lack a native language, instead it is a mixture of different languages: Standard English, Working class and slang English, Standard Spanish, Standard Mexican, just to name a few. Gloira emphasizes the importance to having their own language, in order to keep the lines of communication open. However, most Chicans are afraid to communicate in their own language, due to them feeling as though they speak â€Å"Poor Spanish. † Gloria has embraced her language, she has embraced her identity. We return to the question that was first asked in this essay, does language equal power and does it define you as a writer. We have three writers, all with a purpose, to be defined. Kincaid writes â€Å"But no place could ever really be England, and nobody who did not look exactly like them would never be English† [24], However this is a quote that is true to Fanon. He doesn’t look as the standard Frenchman do, but he considers himself French. Fanon, â€Å"Very often the black man who has become abnormal has never come into contact with Whites. † [124], this is a statement that is true to Kincaid, is it possible that tourist is abnormal because they aren’t in contact with the natives, or true for Chicanas who haven’t come into contact with their own identity. We have Anzaldua, â€Å"A language which they can connect their identity to, one capable of communicating the realities and values true to themselves. †[77]. This quote can be tied into all writers. A â€Å"language† not a colour, government, or native holds the key to reality. All represents powerful quotes and meaning behind them. If you think about each quote can relay to the other writer. So does language hold the power? I say yes, it holds the power of defining you as a writer, it holds the power of defining you as a human, it holds the power to determine your identity.

Nuremberg Trials - Martin Bormann Essays - SS-Obersturmbannfhrer

Nuremberg Trials - Martin Bormann On the night of October 15, 1946, ten of the twelve major war criminals, condemned to death at the Nuremberg trials, were executed. Of the two who eluded the hangman, one was ReichMarshal Hermann Goring, who committed suicide by swallowing a lethal vial of cyanide two hours before his execution. The other man was Reichsleiter Martin Bormann, who had managed to gain an enormous amount of power within the Nazi Party. He was virtually unknown outside of the Party elite as he had worked in the shadows of Hitler. As the end of the war drew near, many of the top Nazis were fleeing. Hermann Goring had fled west, and had been captured by American soldiers, after the death of Hitler had been announced. In Hitler's political will, Goring had been expelled from the party while Martin Bormann had been named Party Minister . According to Jochen Von Lang, Gobbels and Bormann had ?held a military briefing on the night of May 2, 1945. ? Gobbels had already decided to commit suicide but Bormann despe rately wanted to survive. The last entry into his diary was ?escape attempt! ? Martin Bormann's whereabouts after this night is unknown. There are many speculations as to his fate ranging from the probable to the spectacular. Reichsleiter Bormann who, according to A. Zoller, ?exercised absolute control over the whole structure of the Reich? and yet, virtually unknown to the public, was born June 17th, 1900. He was born in Saxon to a Postal Clerk. Bormann joined an anti-Semitic organization in 1920 and by 1923 he was a member of the Freikorps. During this period, he was imprisoned for a year for murder and one year after his release Bormann joined the Nazi Party as a financial administrator. By 1933 he had worked his way to being made a Reichsleiter, a General of the SS and the Chief of Staff to Rudolf Hess. When Hess took flight to England, Bormann gladly inherited his position and became Hitler's deputy. He had many enemies in the Party and Goring explained that even Goebbels feared him and his power . Bormann saw himself to be quite a noble character and in a letter to his wife dated April 2nd, 1945 he wrote that, ?if we are destined, like the Nebeliung, to perish in King Attila's hall, then we go to de ath proudly and with our heads held high.? For all his bravado, as the time to fight arrived, Bormann made a frantic attempt to survive. At the end of the war, the allied leaders decided to prosecute top Nazis as War Criminals in Nuremberg. As Martin Bormann was missing, it was decided that he would be tried in absentia. Although the allies had testimony stating that Bormann was dead, they ignored it because if ?Bormann at this point was to be declared dead by the court, and then to surface later on, die-hard Nazis would suspect that perhaps the Furher was alive too.? In order for allied credibility to remain intact, Bormann was to be tried for Crimes against Peace, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity. Dr. Friedrich Bergold was appointed to this difficult task of defending a missing man. He considered it ?a miscarriage of justice for the Tribunal to try his client in absentia.? The International Tribunal sentenced Reichsleiter Martin Bormann to death. The night of May 1-2, 1945 is the last known whereabouts of Martin Bormann. The Reichsleiter was desperately trying to leave Berlin alive. He had tried to negotiate with the Russians for a brief cease-fire in order for him to obtain a safe passage through the enemy's lines. It had been rejected. The survivors in the Fuhrerbunker were attempting to escape the city and every twenty minutes a group left. Bormann emerged wearing an SS uniform without rank and a leather overcoat. His pocket contained a copy of Hitler's will, securing him to power. His group, that included Axmann, Kempka and Stumpfegger, arrived at the Friedrichstrasse Subway station but were held up at the Weidendammer Bridge. The Russians held the other side of the bridge and therefore made it impossible to cross without the cover of tanks. Miraculously, some German tiger tanks and